Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 01:36

Just in the last 5 years:
Thank you.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What’s next?
Is it common for girlfriends to have close male friends who are single and not related to them?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Paris Erupts in Celebrations, Riots After PSG Wins Champions League - WSJ
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
The Best Dinner to Help You Poop in the A.M., According to a Dietitian - EatingWell
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Nice Hat, Loser - aftermath.site
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
3 No-Brainer AI Stocks to Buy Right Now - Yahoo Finance
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
I'm British and I hate my glasses. Are prescription glasses better in New York City?